We train your team.Training
Three things. Start with the first.
We teach QA teams how to put AI agents inside their own testing process, and we measure whether it worked. The assessment comes first; the other two grow out of it.
Your team already uses AI. Nobody knows if it helps.
We spend two weeks inside your QA team's actual work: the tickets, the prompts, the tests that came out. We measure. Then we hand you a written architecture, skills, subagents and hooks tuned to your product, and measure again.
Week one: we watch
We sit in your QA channel and your tracker. We read the prompts your team writes and the tests that come out. We measure.
Week two: we build
Skills, subagents and hooks for your product, committed to your repo. Your team runs them on real tickets while we are still there.
Week six: we measure again
Same tickets, same people, new setup. The difference is the deliverable. If nothing moved, the report says so.
One day. Your tickets. Your tools.
Not slides. We bring the agent, you bring five real tickets from your backlog, and by the afternoon your testers have run them end to end in Cursor or Claude Code. You leave with the repo installed and a shared idea of what "done" means when an agent did the work.
Ask for datesWritten after three assessments. Not before.
The QA edition of how to build an AI-driven testing workspace, with real teams' before-and-after numbers in it. We won't write it from opinions.
No certification. Qadrillion has no authority to certify anyone, and a badge never caught a bug.