Software testing,
three ways.
We test your product. We hand you the agent we test with. We train your team to use it. Written for the person accountable for quality.
Pick the way that fits where your team is.
End-to-end coverage for web and mobile, written and maintained, for teams that ship weekly. Or a five-day launch check before a first release.
A free, open-source QA agent setup for your own Cursor, Claude Code, Codex or Copilot. And Qaido, our agentic QA SaaS: the same agent working your whole QA board on its own, with a human signing every result.
An assessment of how your QA team uses AI, measured before and after. A one-day workshop, on your tickets, in your tools.
Start with one call. Leave knowing which way fits.
Whether we test, you run the agent, or we train your team: the same first step, the same person in the room.
The tester stays the judge.
Whether we test, you run the agent, or we train your team, a person reads the result, signs it, and owns the call. Everything we make is written for that person.
How we workWho is this for?
The person accountable for quality: a QA lead, a head of QA, or the engineering manager who owns it. Not the CTO, not procurement. Every report, log and contract we produce is written for that reader.
Which of the three ways do we need?
It depends where your team is. No QA capacity: we test it. A QA team that wants to use the agent: take the software. A QA team already using AI, unevenly: training. The scoping call settles it.
What does it cost?
Coverage is a fixed price per test, per month, from €2,100; a five-day launch check is €690. The repo is free; Qaido is a paid subscription, priced at early access. Training is priced per day after the assessment. All ex-VAT, all in the contract.
Do we keep the tests?
Yes. Tests live in your repo from the first commit, in Playwright or Appium, using your page objects and your CI. If we stop working together, nothing leaves with us.
Is the software free?
Part of it. The repo, our QA agent setup for Cursor, Claude Code, Codex and Copilot, is free and open source. Qaido, the agentic QA SaaS that works your QA board on its own, is paid. We test with the same agent and we train on it, so all three ways share one codebase.
Do you replace our QA team?
No. The agent works the ticket; a person on your team reads the result and signs it. The tester stays the judge, which is the only reason the numbers are worth anything.